XF-KIF76Q6-O Two-Sided Reputation in Certification Markets
Abstract
In a market where sellers solicit certification to overcome asymmetric information, we show that the profit of a monopolistic certifier can be hump-shaped in its reputation for accuracy: a higher accuracy attracts high-quality sellers but sometimes repels low-quality sellers. As a consequence, reputational concerns may induce the certifier to reduce information quality, thus depressing welfare. The entry of a second certifier impacts reputational incentives: when sellers only solicit one certifier, competition plays a disciplining role and the region where reputation is bad shrinks. Conversely, this region may expand when sellers hold multiple certifications. This paper was accepted by Gustavo Manso, finance.
Source: resolved
Cites (1)
Works cited in this paper's bibliography that are themselves in the XFID registry.
Cited by (1)
Other RESEARCH documents in the registry that cite this work.
How to Cite This Record
Use the XFID in citations to create a stable, permanent reference that resolves to this registry entry regardless of the source URL.
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) (2018). Two-Sided Reputation in Certification Markets. XFID: XF-KIF76Q6-O. Retrieved from https://xframework.id/XFKIF76Q6O
XF-KIF76Q6-O