XF-KIF76Q6-O Two-Sided Reputation in Certification Markets
Abstract
In a market where sellers solicit certification to overcome asymmetric information, we show that the profit of a monopolistic certifier can be hump-shaped in its reputation for accuracy: a higher accuracy attracts high-quality sellers but sometimes repels low-quality sellers. As a consequence, reputational concerns may induce the certifier to reduce information quality, thus depressing welfare. The entry of a second certifier impacts reputational incentives: when sellers only solicit one certifier, competition plays a disciplining role and the region where reputation is bad shrinks. Conversely, this region may expand when sellers hold multiple certifications. This paper was accepted by Gustavo Manso, finance.
Source: resolved
Cited by (1)
Other RESEARCH documents in the registry that cite this work.
How to Cite This Record
Use the XFID in citations to create a stable, permanent reference that resolves to this registry entry regardless of the source URL.
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) (2018). Two-Sided Reputation in Certification Markets. XFID: XF-KIF76Q6-O. Retrieved from https://xframework.id/XFKIF76Q6O
XF-KIF76Q6-O