XF-EGBGESZ-X Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis
Abstract
Abstract: This paper studies the performance of 60 European funds from four countries. The paper extends the UK matched pair approach for fund evaluation developed by Mallin et al. (1995) to a European setting. The findings suggest that there is no difference between ethical and non‐ethical funds according to the performance measures employed. Neither type of fund displayed any ability to time the market. Finally, the results indicate that the management fee is a significant explanatory variable for the Jensen measure as Chen et al. (1992) and Grinblatt and Titman (1994) suggested.
Source: resolved
Verification
XFIDs are content-addressed: these SHA-256 fingerprints let anyone confirm a copy of this document is identical to what XFID retrieved on 5 May 2026 — independent of this registry.
The canonical-content hash survives re-downloads, URL moves, and byte-level re-encodes: the same disclosure text always resolves to this XFID.
Cited by (5)
Other RESEARCH documents in the registry that cite this work.
- The Effect of Pro-Environmental Preferences on Bond Prices: Evidence from Green Bonds (2019)
- The green bond premium (2017) Abstract
- Incorporating Sustainability Criteria into Credit Risk Management (2008) Abstract
- Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior (2008) Abstract
- The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds (2008) Abstract
How to Cite This Record
Use the XFID in citations to create a stable, permanent reference that resolves to this registry entry regardless of the source URL.
Wiley (Business Strategy and the Environment) (2005). Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis. XFID: XF-EGBGESZ-X. Retrieved from https://xframework.id/XFEGBGESZX
XF-EGBGESZ-X