Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation

Abstract

biological conservation 169 (2014) 258–267 contents lists available at sciencedirect biological conservation j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b i o c o n perspective commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation michael b. mascia a,⇑,3, sharon pailler a,1,3, michele l. thieme a, andy rowe b, madeleine c. bottrill c, finn danielsen d, jonas geldmann e, robin naidoo a, andrew s. pullin f, neil d. burgess a,e,2 a conservation science program, world wildlife fund, 1250 24th st. nw, washington, dc 20037, usa b arceconomics inc., 160 westcott, salt spring island, bc v8k 1c2, canada c conservation international, 2011 crystal drive, suite 500, arlington, va 22202, usa d nordisk fond for miljø og udvikling, skindergade 23-iii, dk-1159 copenhagen, denmark e center for macroecology, evolution and climate, department of biology, university of copenhagen, ole maaløes vej 5, dk-2200 copenhagen, denmark f centre for evidence-based conservation, school of environment, natural resources and geography, bangor university, bangor, gwynedd ll54 2uw, uk a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t article history: received 24 april 2013 received in revised form 30 october 2013 accepted 14 november 2013 keywords: ambient monitoring management assessment performance measurement impact evaluation systematic review commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation …

Source: pdf_first_chars