XF-W5RUY50-D Research / Academic Paper ACTIVE
Can multifarious types of green bonds be accused of greenwashing with a durative analysis? Insights from a permanent causality vs. temporary causality phenomenon
Verification
XFIDs are content-addressed: these SHA-256 fingerprints let anyone confirm a copy of this document is identical to what XFID retrieved on 26 May 2026 — independent of this registry.
The canonical-content hash survives re-downloads, URL moves, and byte-level re-encodes: the same disclosure text always resolves to this XFID.
Related Documents
Issuers Discussed
Bond issuers referenced in this paper that have documents in the registry.
Cites (4)
Works cited in this paper's bibliography that are themselves in the XFID registry.
- The Green Bonding Hypothesis: How do Green Bonds Enhance the Credibility of Environmental Commitments (2021) Abstract
- The surge of impact borrowing: The magnitude and determinants of green bond supply and its heterogeneity across markets (2019) Abstract
- Does it pay to be green? (2017) Abstract
- The Effects of Corporate Social Performance on the Cost of Corporate Debt and Credit Ratings (2014) Abstract
Version History
| Retrieved | Action | Size | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26/05/2026 | INITIAL | 2538 KB | latest |
How to Cite This Record
Use the XFID in citations to create a stable, permanent reference that resolves to this registry entry regardless of the source URL.
Academic / report citation
Environment, Development and Sustainability (2024). Can multifarious types of green bonds be accused of greenwashing with a durative analysis? Insights from a permanent causality vs. temporary causality phenomenon. XFID: XF-W5RUY50-D. Retrieved from https://xframework.id/XFW5RUY50D
Identifier only
XF-W5RUY50-D